MAP Finance durable : Bank Of Africa s’engage pleinement lors de la 16ème édition du SIAM MAP Match USMA-RSB: La CAF sanctionne l’USMA par un forfait de 0-3, le match retour maintenu à Berkane (FRMF) APS SENEGAL-GAMBIE-SOCIETE / Kaffrine : une “case culturelle de bon voisinage” inaugurée à Kelimane APS SENEGAL-ECONOMIE / À Dakar, le petit commerce est victime des opérations de désencombrement APS SENEGAL-SANTE / Ibrahima Sy tend la main aux acteurs pour construire un système “résilient et durable” APS SENEGAL-SANTE / Commerce illicite des médicaments : cinq nouveaux pharmaciens inspecteurs pour épauler l’ARP APS SENEGAL-SOCIETE-JUSTICE / Amnesty international invite le président Faye à abroger l’arrêté ”Ousmane Ngom” MAP Sénégal/Paludisme : 199 décès sur 7196 cas d’hospitalisation recensés en 2023 (responsable) MAP Madagascar et le FMI examinent la reconduction de deux accords de financement MAP Mme Akharbach salue à Abidjan la pertinence de la résolution de l’ONU sur l’IA initiée par le Maroc et les Etats-Unis

Former SSNIT Boss’ application for special leave thrown out


  16 Octobre      29        Société (45111),

 

Accra, Oct. 16, GNA – The Supreme Court has dismissed an application

for leave brought by Ernest Thompson, former Boss of the Social Security

and National Insurance Trust (SSNIT), on the grounds that his

circumstance for the application had not been met.

Thompson had gone to the Supreme Court with a motion on notice for

special leave to enable him to appeal against the decision of the Court

of Appeal.

Thompson and four others have been put before the court for

allegedly causing financial loss to the state in the purchase of SSNIT’s

Operational Business Suite (OBS) Project involving the procurement of

high tech-servers, scanners, and printers among other things.

Thompson had indicated his opposition to the ruling of the trial

judge and served notice to proceed to file a stay of proceedings at the

Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal also dismissed the application for stay of

proceedings hence proceeded to the Supreme Court to grant them special

leave to enable them to appeal against the Court of Appeal’s decision.

He was praying the High Court to provide further and better

particulars of charges against him in relation to Article 19(2)(d).

Article 19(2)(d) states that the accused person must be informed in

detail of the charges preferred against him or her but that had been

violated by the prosecution.

The accused person, through his Counsel, Mr Samuel Cudjoe,

indicated that in the charge of willfully causing financial loss to the

State, the State failed to mention those acts or omissions committed by

the accused person.

Mr Cudjoe noted that the State’s failure to provide them with

further and better particulars of the charges was like “tying his

client’s hands behind him.”

According to him that was also going to make his client face

difficulty in defending himself.

Mr Richard Gyambiby, an Assistant State Attorney, who was being led

by Ms Frances William Addo, said the application intended to waste time

and the tax payers’ money hence prayed the five-member panel of the

Supreme Court to dismiss the application.

He said the Supreme had previously ruled on same subject matter and

the prosecution had maintained its position over the years.

The panel included Justices Sule Gbadegbe (Presiding), Justice Agnes

Dodzie, Justice Marfu-Sau, Justice Nene Amegatcher, and Justice

Professor Ashie Kotey.

Dans la même catégorie