AIP Côte d’Ivoire/Le Conseil café-cacao offre 2000 kits scolaires et des tables-bancs aux enfants des producteurs AIP Présidentielle 2020 : Patrick Achi invite le Zanzan à voter Ouattara pour pérenniser le développement de la Côte d’Ivoire AIP Côte d’Ivoire-AIP/ Le nouveau préfet du département de Téhini a pris service MAP M. Bourita reçoit le nouvel ambassadeur de Guinée Bissau au Maroc AIP Côte d‘Ivoire-AIP/ La Journée africaine des droits de l’Homme commémorée à Abidjan AIP Côte d’Ivoire-AIP/ L’axe Tiébissou-Bouaké rouvert à la circulation après avoir été obstrué par un tronc d’arbre INFOPRESS São Vicente: Más Soncent movement denounces destruction of election propaganda material including theft of billboards INFOPRESS FAO realiza Workshop de Capacitação e Sensibilização sobre relação existente entre nutrição e comércio INFOPRESS Fogo: Sindicato Democrático dos Professores distribui máscaras aos seus associados a nível da ilha ATOP LE MINISTRE MIJIYAWA LANCE UN APPEL A LA MOBILISATION GENERALE

Opuni’s Trial: Agricult never registered to manufacture fertilizer-Witness

  14 Octobre      11        Agriculture (1603),


Accra, Oct. 14, GNA – Agricult Ghana Limited has never applied to the Pesticides and Fertilizer Regulatory Division (PFRD) under the Plant Protection Regulatory Services Directorate (PPRSD) to manufacture fertilizer in Ghana.

Dr Felicia Ansah-Amprofi, the fourth prosecution witness in the case involving Dr Stephen Opuni and two others said Agricult Ghana Limited only applied for a certificate to import and distribute Lithovit follar fertilizer into the country.

Dr Ansah-Amprofi was answering questions in a cross-examination led by Mr Nutifafa Nutsukpui, Counsel for Seidu Agongo, Chief Executive Officer of Agricult Ghana Limited.

The witness said as explained to the court, the application for registration submitted by Agricult Ghana Limited was for certification to import and distribute fertilizer meant for food crops, not for Cocoa.

The Counsel asked the witness, whether per their records, there was any evidence to show that Agricult was registered to manufacture fertilizer but the witness answered in the negative.

Dr Ansah-Amprofi explaining further said per their records, they were expecting to see lithovit powder fertilizer on the shelves in the market but what the inspectors saw on the shelves was different.

She said “so my lord, whether it was imported or not it will be difficult for me to answer but per the records, we have an entity which cannot bring any fertilizer product into the country without a permit from the PPRSD.”

She said maybe the product might have been smuggled or manufactured in the country.

Mr Nutsukpui asked the witness, whether there was any evidence in their records that indicated Mr Agongo ever submitted any application for the registration of Lithovit follar fertilizer in his personal capacity, the witness said the application was submitted by the CEO of Agricult Ghana Limited.

“The CEO was the one, who signed the letter for the application for the registration,” she added.

The Counsel enquired that the PFRD, having been established by the Fertilizer Act meant that the Act provided the requirements and conditions for the registration of fertilizer and the witness answered in the affirmative.

She said the Fertilizer Act 803 and its regulations made provision on how to register fertilizer products.

Mr Nutsukpui said, “You told the court that the duration for registration of all fertilizer products is two years and can be renewed for another two years, ”the witness answered in the affirmative.

He asked Dr Ansah-Amprofi, whether there were any exemptions to the duration and renewal procedures either by the Fertilizer Act 803 or L.I 2194 and the witness said per the Acts and its regulations there were no exceptions.

The Counsel enquired from the witness whether, persons or entities interested in dealing in fertiliser in respect of Cocoa must bring Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana (CRIG) Certification to PPRSD, the witness answered in the affirmative.

Asked, whether the requirement that the entities should furnished the PFRD with report and certificate from CRIG was a prescription of Act 803 or L.I 2194 and the witness said it was in the procedures and guidelines for registration.

She said it was so because before Act 803, registration of product for Cocoa was being carried out by CRIG, because of the nature of Cocoa.

She said with the enactment of the Act, which superseded all registration of fertiliser products, a letter was written to CRIG, requesting CRIG to submit all results on products trials, so they could issue certification for Cocoa products.

She explained that CRIG was invited for a discussion on the certification of Cocoa products, there CRIG informed PPRSD Cocobod needed to put in a request for the trials.

Counsel ended his cross-examination of the fourth prosecution witness.

The trial is adjourned to October 14, 2020 for the prosecution to introduce its fifth witness

Dr Opuni and Mr Seidu Agongo are facing 27 charges, including defrauding by false pretences, wilfully causing financial loss to the state, money laundering, corruption by a public officer and contravention of the Public Procurement Act.

They have both pleaded not guilty to the charges and are on a GHS300,000.00 self-recognisance bail each.

Dans la même catégorie