MAP Le Maroc soutient la candidature d’Audrey Azoulay pour un second mandat à la tête de l’Unesco AIP Côte d’Ivoire-AIP/ Le Conseil du Café-Cacao et Ghana Cocoa Board suspendent « toute collaboration » avec l’association des chocolatiers américains ANP Elections générales 2020-2021 : L’ordre de passage des partis politiques dans les medias est désormais connu ACI Congo : Adoption d’une feuille de route pour l’accélération de l’opérationnalisation du Fonds Bleu ACI Congo : 13 milliards de Fcfa mobilisés pour lutter contre les érosions à Nkayi et à Owando ANG Nova nova orgânica do Governo que introduz a figura de vice-primeiro-ministro ANG Cooperação/Administrador da empresa CETIS encontra-se em Bissau por uma visita de trabalho de dois dias. ANG Ensino/Conaiguib exige início das aulas na Universidade Amílcar Cabral e Liceu Atadamum GNA Komfuefu community gets CHPS Compound GNA KOICA supports farmer cooperatives with warehouses

U.S. Commerce Department not to enforce TikTok ban pending further legal developments

  16 Novembre      11        Economie (10415),


Accra, Nov. 16, (Xinhua/GNA) – The U.S. Commerce Department said that it will not enforce an order to ban popular video-sharing app TikTok « pending further legal developments, » citing a recent ruling by a federal district court.

The department’s last-minute announcement would delay the implementation of the action set to take effect on Thursday.

In a statement, the department cited a preliminary injunction against the ban, ordered by Judge Wendy Beetlestone of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on October 30, following a lawsuit filed by three TikTok content creators.

The judge ruled she found that the U.S. government’s « own descriptions of the national security threat posed by the TikTok app are phrased in the hypothetical, » and therefore she could not find that « the risk presented by the government outweighs the public interest in enjoining » the ban.

A separate ruling by Judge Carl Nichols of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on September 27 also temporarily blocked a partial ban, which would prevent new downloads of the app and software updates for existing users.

The request for a preliminary injunction was filed by TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance. On August 6, U.S. President Donald Trump issued an executive order banning U.S. transactions with TikTok and ByteDance after 45 days, citing national security concerns.

A similar order was issued for WeChat, a messaging, social-media and mobile-payment app owned by Chinese tech giant Tencent.

« The actions against TikTok and WeChat are to weaken China’s role in the global digital economy generally, mainly for geopolitical reasons, » Jeffrey Sachs, an economics professor at Columbia University and a senior United Nations advisor, told Xinhua earlier.

On August 14, Trump signed another executive order that forces ByteDance to sell or spin off its U.S. TikTok business within 90 days, setting the deadline of November 12.

TikTok filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against the Trump administration, challenging the legality and constitutionality of the August 6 Executive Order, and arguing that there is no credible evidence to back up Trump’s national security claims.

The Commerce Department, citing the President’s August 6 Executive Order, said earlier that TikTok would have to be removed from U.S. app stores on September 20.

The partial ban was later delayed by a week to September 27. The department also said a more extensive ban against the app would be applied starting from November 12.

In September, Trump gave a preliminary approval for ByteDance to sell the popular app to U.S. buyers, and a potential deal among ByteDance, Oracle and Walmart emerged.

However, the U.S. administration offered no further decisions in recent weeks.

Earlier this week, TikTok announced that it has filed a petition to a federal appeals court seeking to invalidate the U.S. government’s divestiture order issued on August 14.

The Los Angeles-based tech firm said in a statement that it had asked the government for a 30-day extension because it was « facing continual new requests and no clarity on whether our proposed solutions would be accepted, » but it had not been granted one.

Dans la même catégorie