MAP Addis-Abeba: L’Union Panafricaine de la Jeunesse tient un Forum consultatif en prélude au Sommet de l’avenir des Nations Unies MAP Sénégal: ouverture à Dakar de la 6è édition du festival  »Films femmes Afrique » MAP Agriculture/Irrigation : le Maroc, un modèle à suivre (ministre ivoirien) Aménagement et bitumage des voiries à Bobo-Dioulasso : les acteurs économiques expriment leur reconnaissance au Chef de l’Etat ANP Région de Zinder : WAPCO et CHINA Petroleum offrent un lot d’équipements sportifs et de matériels scolaires à la jeunesse de Damagaram Takaya AIP Côte d’Ivoire: Vers la mise en place d’un registre national des malformations congénitales L’Etat réaffirme son engagement à accompagner le cinéma et l’audiovisuel (ministre) AIB Burkina : Le Parlement dit oui à la tenue d’assises nationales où se décidera la suite de la Transition AIB Aménagement et bitumage des voiries à Bobo-Dioulasso : les acteurs économiques expriment leur reconnaissance au Chef de l’Etat AIB Spectacle de parachutistes commandos à Bobo, en prélude à l’ouverture de la SNC 2024

Former SSNIT Boss’ application for special leave thrown out


  16 Octobre      29        Société (45146),

 

Accra, Oct. 16, GNA – The Supreme Court has dismissed an application

for leave brought by Ernest Thompson, former Boss of the Social Security

and National Insurance Trust (SSNIT), on the grounds that his

circumstance for the application had not been met.

Thompson had gone to the Supreme Court with a motion on notice for

special leave to enable him to appeal against the decision of the Court

of Appeal.

Thompson and four others have been put before the court for

allegedly causing financial loss to the state in the purchase of SSNIT’s

Operational Business Suite (OBS) Project involving the procurement of

high tech-servers, scanners, and printers among other things.

Thompson had indicated his opposition to the ruling of the trial

judge and served notice to proceed to file a stay of proceedings at the

Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal also dismissed the application for stay of

proceedings hence proceeded to the Supreme Court to grant them special

leave to enable them to appeal against the Court of Appeal’s decision.

He was praying the High Court to provide further and better

particulars of charges against him in relation to Article 19(2)(d).

Article 19(2)(d) states that the accused person must be informed in

detail of the charges preferred against him or her but that had been

violated by the prosecution.

The accused person, through his Counsel, Mr Samuel Cudjoe,

indicated that in the charge of willfully causing financial loss to the

State, the State failed to mention those acts or omissions committed by

the accused person.

Mr Cudjoe noted that the State’s failure to provide them with

further and better particulars of the charges was like “tying his

client’s hands behind him.”

According to him that was also going to make his client face

difficulty in defending himself.

Mr Richard Gyambiby, an Assistant State Attorney, who was being led

by Ms Frances William Addo, said the application intended to waste time

and the tax payers’ money hence prayed the five-member panel of the

Supreme Court to dismiss the application.

He said the Supreme had previously ruled on same subject matter and

the prosecution had maintained its position over the years.

The panel included Justices Sule Gbadegbe (Presiding), Justice Agnes

Dodzie, Justice Marfu-Sau, Justice Nene Amegatcher, and Justice

Professor Ashie Kotey.

Dans la même catégorie