MAP SAR la Princesse Lalla Meryem préside le Conseil d’Administration des Oeuvres Sociales des FAR MAP Signature de deux mémorandums d’entente entre le Maroc et Djibouti dans le domaine de la santé et de la protection sociale ANP La CAIMA offre 3043,75 tonnes d’engrais d’une valeur de 821 millions de CFA au FSSP APS SENEGAL-COMMERCE / Des faux médicaments, des cuisses de poulet et du cannabis saisis par les unités maritimes de la Douane APS SENEGAL-METEO / Le centre et l’ouest seront recouverts progressivement par une couche de poussière dense (météo) MAP Rwanda: le volume des investissements dépasse 2,4 milliards de dollars en 2023 MAP Match USMA-RSB: la CAF rejette l’Appel interjeté par le club algérois et confirme les décisions de la commission des clubs (FRMF) MAP Madagascar: Plaidoyer pour la création d’un réseau de transport public écologique à Antananarivo MAP Abidjan: le RIARC et le REFRAM signent une déclaration sur le renforcement du dialogue avec les plateformes numériques globales APS SENEGAL-SOCIETE / Santé oculaire : des stratégies et orientations prioritaires en cours d’identification

Election Petition: Petitioner ordered to file witness statement by Wednesday


  26 Janvier      34        Justice (1670), Politique (25374), Société (45143),

 

Accra, Jan. 26, GNA – The Supreme Court, has for the second time, ordered the Petitioner in the Election 2020 Petition to file its witness statements by close of Wednesday, January 27, 2021.

The seven-member panel said failure to file the witness statements would compel the Court to invoke sanctions of Rule 69 of CI 16, which had been amended by CI 99.

Under Rule 69, the Court has the power to dismiss the petition or impose punitive cost against the Petitioner.

The Court said because the Petitioner’s lawyers had not complied with the orders of the Court by filing their witness statements and legal objections, it was not ready to listen to any application filed by them.

According to the Supreme Court, « we don’t appreciate a party to seek further audience if it had not complied with the orders,” and that, “Case Management Conference (CMC) should not be compromised. »

The Court said all the parties except the Petitioner, had filed the witness statements.

When sitting resumed, Mr Tony Lithur, Counsel for the Petitioner, informed the Court that they had filed a review application and others but had not been able to file their witness statements.

According to Mr Lithur, the decision of the Supreme Court on the review application would help them prepare their witness statements.

The Court has adjourned the matter to Thursday, January 28, 2021.

Dans la même catégorie